Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro M2000M
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro M2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics P580 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro M2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro M2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 or Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Quadro M2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M2000M has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 60 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000M.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 688 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
18−20
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 69% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
170−180
220−230
medium / 768p
140−150
190−200
ultra / 1080p
70−75
110−120
QHD / 1440p
40−45
70−75
4K / 2160p
30−33
40−45
high / 768p
100−110
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
medium / 768p
75−80
100−110
ultra / 1080p
45−50
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
7−8
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
75−80
110−120
medium / 1080p
35−40
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 61% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
16−18
30−35
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
10−12
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
65−70
95−100
medium / 768p
55−60
85−90
high / 1080p
18−20
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
5−6
9−10
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
90−95
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
65−70
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
35−40
65−70
medium / 768p
21−24
40−45
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Quadro M2000M
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Maxwell
Code name
Skylake GT4e
GM107
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 September 2015
2 October 2015
Pipelines
72
640
Core clock speed
350 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1197 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
75.60
43.92
Floating-point performance
1,405 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Shader Model
6.4
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.97
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
173 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
