Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    NVS 510 vs Quadro M2000M

    When comparing NVS 510 and Quadro M2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro M2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    NVS 510 Check Price
    Quadro M2000M Check Price

    Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:

    Quadro M2000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      NVS 510 Quadro M2000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 55 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro M2000M has 57% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
    • NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
    • Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
    • NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 241 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
    • NVS 510 and Quadro M2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 3218 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 0−1 18−20
    ultra / 1080p − 10−11
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 4−5
    4K / 2160p − 4−5
    low / 720p 1−2 35−40
    medium / 1080p 0−1 21−24
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than NVS 510.

    Full Specs

      NVS 510 Quadro M2000M
    Architecture Kepler Maxwell
    Code name GK107 GM107
    Type Workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 23 October 2012 2 October 2015
    Pipelines 192 640
    Core clock speed 797 MHz 1038 MHz
    Boost Clock 1197 MHz
    Transistor count 1,270 million 1,870 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 12.75 43.92
    Floating-point performance 306.0 gflops 1,405 gflops
    Length 160 mm
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1782 MHz 5000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 28.51 GB/s 80 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 (11_0) 12
    Shader Model 5.1 5.0
    OpenGL 4.6 4.5
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.126 1.1.126
    CUDA 3.0 5.0
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 17 Mh/s 173 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    Optimus +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares