NVS 810 vs Quadro M2000M

When choosing between NVS 810 and Quadro M2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between NVS 810 and Quadro M2000M.

NVS 810 Check Price

Quadro M2000M Check Price

Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:

Quadro M2000M Laptops

Main Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro M2000M
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	55 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	8x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 810 has 23% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
NVS 810 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 810 and Quadro M2000M are build with Maxwell architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 136 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 and Quadro M2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 3200 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	18−20
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	4−5	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	16−18	60−65
medium / 1080p	6−7	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	120−130	220−230
medium / 768p	95−100	190−200
ultra / 1080p	40−45	110−120
QHD / 1440p	21−24	70−75
4K / 2160p	16−18	40−45
high / 768p	65−70	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 116% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	80−85	110−120
medium / 768p	45−50	100−110
ultra / 1080p	21−24	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 98% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	2−3	7−8
low / 720p	10−12	45−50
medium / 1080p	4−5	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	10−11	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	4−5	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	110−120
medium / 1080p	10−12	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 206% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	5−6	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	3−4	10−12
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	18−20	60−65
medium / 1080p	8−9	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	45−50	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	4−5	35−40
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	4−5	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 27% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	10−11	65−70
medium / 768p	8−9	40−45
high / 1080p	4−5	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 58% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro M2000M
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Code name	GM107	GM107
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	4 November 2015	2 October 2015
Pipelines	512	640
Core clock speed	902 MHz	1038 MHz
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	1197 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	33.06	43.92
Floating-point performance	2x 1,058 gflops	1,405 gflops
Length	198 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0	5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		173 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 810 vs Quadro M2000M

Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares