Quadro M2000M vs Radeon 520
In this comparison between Quadro M2000M and Radeon 520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon 520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M2000M and Radeon 520 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro M2000M and Radeon 520 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M or Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2000M
Radeon 520
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
50 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M2000M has 10% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon 520.
Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 8 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
Quadro M2000M and Radeon 520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 2750 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
18−20
0−1
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
35−40
1−2
medium / 1080p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
60−65
0−1
medium / 1080p
30−35
−
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon 520.
low / 768p
220−230
55−60
medium / 768p
190−200
30−33
ultra / 1080p
110−120
6−7
QHD / 1440p
70−75
−
4K / 2160p
40−45
−
high / 768p
150−160
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 514% more, than Radeon 520.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
45−50
0−1
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
Quadro M2000M and Radeon 520 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
110−120
45−50
medium / 768p
100−110
10−11
ultra / 1080p
75−80
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
45−50
0−1
medium / 1080p
24−27
−
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
110−120
21−24
medium / 1080p
65−70
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 422% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
30−35
0−1
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
low / 720p
60−65
0−1
medium / 1080p
35−40
0−1
low / 768p
95−100
18−20
medium / 768p
85−90
−
high / 1080p
35−40
0−1
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
10−12
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 768p
110−120
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon 520.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
65−70
10−11
medium / 1080p
18−20
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 330% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
low / 768p
65−70
0−1
medium / 768p
40−45
−
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
35−40
0−1
high / 768p
55−60
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon 520.
Full Specs
Quadro M2000M
Radeon 520
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Code name
GM107
Oland
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
2 October 2015
21 March 2017
Pipelines
640
320
Core clock speed
1038 MHz
1030 MHz
Boost Clock
1197 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
43.92
20.60
Floating-point performance
1,405 gflops
659.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
16 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12
12.0
Shader Model
5.0
5.0
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
+
CUDA
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
173 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price