Quadro M2000M vs Radeon 540
When choosing between Quadro M2000M and Radeon 540, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M2000M and Radeon 540.
Radeon 540
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon 540 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M has 10% more power consumption, than Radeon 540.
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon 540.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon 540 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon 540 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 540 is 62 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 540 is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 175% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 97% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 123% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 153% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 57% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 144% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 176% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon 540 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Lexa |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 26 March 2019 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 35.97 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 56 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |