Quadro M2000M vs Radeon E6760
When choosing between Quadro M2000M and Radeon E6760, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M2000M and Radeon E6760.
Radeon E6760
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon E6760 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M has 22% more power consumption, than Radeon E6760.
- Both video cards are using MXM-A (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro M2000M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon E6760.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 438 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
- Quadro M2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon E6760 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 1800 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 123% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 206% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon E6760 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GM107 | Turks |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 2 May 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 11.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | 52 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |