Quadro M2000M vs Radeon HD 7670A
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M2000M and Radeon HD 7670A. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M2000M and Radeon HD 7670A. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 7670A
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M has 22% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Both video cards are using MXM-A (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro M2000M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 438 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Quadro M2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7670A - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 116% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 94% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 480% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 206% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 388% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 360% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 414% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GM107 | Turks |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 5 January 2012 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |