Quadro M2000M vs Radeon Pro SSG
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M2000M and Radeon Pro SSG, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M2000M stacks up against Radeon Pro SSG, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro SSG
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 350 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro SSG has 536% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro SSG uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro SSG has 12 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro SSG - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro SSG - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro SSG is 402 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro SSG - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 3110 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro SSG.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 187% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Battlefield 5 is 203% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Dota 2 is 19% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Far Cry 5 is 178% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Fortnite is 148% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Forza Horizon 4 is 178% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 196% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 190% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 223% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Quadro M2000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Vega 10 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 8 August 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 4096 |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 12,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 384.0 |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 12,288 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.125 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |