Quadro M2000M vs Radeon Pro W5500M
When comparing Quadro M2000M and Radeon Pro W5500M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M2000M and Radeon Pro W5500M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro W5500M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 54% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro M2000M and Radeon Pro W5500M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- Quadro M2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 7000 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 16% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
Quadro M2000M and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro M2000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Navi 14 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |