Quadro M2000M vs Radeon R7 M270DX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M2000M and Radeon R7 M270DX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M2000M and Radeon R7 M270DX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 138 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270DX.
- Quadro M2000M and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 127% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 205% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Topaz |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |