Quadro M2000M vs Radeon R8 M535DX
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M2000M and Radeon R8 M535DX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M2000M stacks up against Radeon R8 M535DX, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R8 M535DX
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R8 M535DX uses IGP interface.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R8 M535DX - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R8 M535DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 258 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M535DX.
- Quadro M2000M and Radeon R8 M535DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 514% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| Quadro M2000M and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 422% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Meso |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 18 April 2017 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 891 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 17.82 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |