Quadro M2000M vs Radeon R9 A375
In this comparison between Quadro M2000M and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 138 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Quadro M2000M and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 4996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 116% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 206% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | no data |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro M2000M vs Tesla C2050
- Quadro M2000M vs Quadro 7000
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Tesla C2050
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 7000
- Quadro M2000M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Quadro M2000M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M