Quadro M2000M vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
In this comparison between Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 460 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 460 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 460 mobile are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 460 mobile are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M or Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 55 Watt.
Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 460 mobile have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
Quadro M2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 1000 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
8−9
6−7
4K / 2160p
6−7
5−6
low / 720p
60−65
55−60
medium / 1080p
30−35
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
low / 768p
220−230
210−220
medium / 768p
190−200
180−190
ultra / 1080p
110−120
100−110
QHD / 1440p
70−75
60−65
4K / 2160p
40−45
30−35
high / 768p
150−160
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
45−50
40−45
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
75−80
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
high / 1080p
21−24
20−22
ultra / 1080p
20−22
18−20
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
low / 720p
45−50
40−45
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
110−120
100−110
medium / 1080p
65−70
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 6% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
10−12
10−11
low / 720p
60−65
55−60
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
85−90
80−85
high / 1080p
35−40
30−35
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
QHD / 1440p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
high / 1080p
10−12
10−11
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
medium / 768p
40−45
35−40
high / 1080p
21−24
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
Quadro M2000M and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Architecture
Maxwell
Polaris
Code name
GM107
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
2 October 2015
8 August 2016
Pipelines
640
896
Core clock speed
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1197 MHz
1180 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
43.92
66.08
Floating-point performance
1,405 gflops
2,115 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.0
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
5.0
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
173 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
