FirePro S10000 vs Quadro M2200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S10000 and Quadro M2200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S10000 and Quadro M2200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S10000
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S10000 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 1263% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- FirePro S10000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M2200.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 131 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- FirePro S10000 and Quadro M2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 508 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S10000 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S10000 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 48% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 45% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 58% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 58% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S10000 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tahiti | N17P-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2012 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 694 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 106.4 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | |
| Length | 305 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5508 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |