FirePro S7150 vs Quadro M2200
When choosing between FirePro S7150 and Quadro M2200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7150 and Quadro M2200.
FirePro S7150
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- FirePro S7150 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M2200.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 226 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- FirePro S7150 and Quadro M2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 508 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7150 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S7150 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 48% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 45% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 58% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 58% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tonga | N17P-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 February 2016 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 694 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 117.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5508 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |