FirePro S9050 vs Quadro M2200

When choosing between FirePro S9050 and Quadro M2200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9050 and Quadro M2200.

FirePro S9050 Check Price

Quadro M2200 Check Price

Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:

Quadro M2200 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro S9050	Quadro M2200
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	55 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
FirePro S9050 has 8 GB more memory, than Quadro M2200.
FirePro S9050 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 206 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
FirePro S9050 and Quadro M2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 8 MHz higher, than FirePro S9050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
QHD / 1440p	6−7	8−9
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	40−45
medium / 1080p	24−27	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	30−35	35−40
ultra / 1080p	27−30	30−35
QHD / 1440p	10−12	16−18
4K / 2160p	7−8	10−11
low / 720p	65−70	75−80
medium / 1080p	35−40	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S9050 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	240−250
medium / 768p	200−210	210−220
ultra / 1080p	110−120	130−140
QHD / 1440p	85−90	100−110
4K / 2160p	45−50	55−60
high / 768p	160−170	180−190
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	55−60
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	24−27
QHD / 1440p	18−20	21−24
4K / 2160p	7−8	9−10
low / 720p	50−55	55−60
medium / 1080p	27−30	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	30−35	35−40
ultra / 1080p	24−27	27−30
QHD / 1440p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	120−130	130−140
medium / 1080p	70−75	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 11% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	30−35	35−40
ultra / 1080p	24−27	30−33
QHD / 1440p	12−14	16−18
4K / 2160p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	65−70	75−80
medium / 1080p	35−40	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
medium / 768p	90−95	100−110
high / 1080p	40−45	45−50
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
QHD / 1440p	7−8	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	12−14
QHD / 1440p	10−11	10−12
4K / 2160p	2−3	4−5
low / 720p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	16−18	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
FirePro S9050 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	75−80
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	14−16	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−11	10−12
QHD / 1440p	1−2	3−4
4K / 2160p	1−2	2−3
low / 720p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	20−22	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	70−75	85−90
medium / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
4K / 2160p	8−9	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 18% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	40−45
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
FirePro S9050 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9050	Quadro M2200
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Code name	Tahiti	N17P-Q3
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	7 August 2014	13 January 2017
Pipelines	1792	1024
Core clock speed	900 MHz	694 MHz
Boost Clock		1038 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	1870 Million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops
Length	254 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	5508 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	88 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
Form factor	full height / full length
Display Port		1.2
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
3D Stereo		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 vs Quadro M2200

Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares