FirePro V4900 vs Quadro M2200

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V4900 and Quadro M2200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V4900 stacks up against Quadro M2200, check out specs charts below.

FirePro V4900 Check Price

Quadro M2200 Check Price

Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:

Quadro M2200 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro V4900	Quadro M2200
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	55 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V4900 has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
Quadro M2200 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 106 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 1508 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	1−2	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	12−14	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 440% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	6−7	35−40
ultra / 1080p	5−6	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	16−18	75−80
medium / 1080p	6−7	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 487% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V4900 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	240−250
medium / 768p	90−95	210−220
ultra / 1080p	40−45	130−140
QHD / 1440p	24−27	100−110
4K / 2160p	−	55−60
high / 768p	65−70	180−190
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	75−80	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	55−60
medium / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	70−75	120−130
medium / 768p	50−55	110−120
ultra / 1080p	24−27	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 118% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	3−4	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	21−24
4K / 2160p	1−2	9−10
low / 720p	12−14	55−60
medium / 1080p	4−5	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	10−12	35−40
ultra / 1080p	6−7	27−30
QHD / 1440p	4−5	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	130−140
medium / 1080p	12−14	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 252% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	7−8	35−40
ultra / 1080p	6−7	30−33
QHD / 1440p	1−2	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	18−20	75−80
medium / 1080p	9−10	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 412% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	35−40	100−110
high / 1080p	6−7	45−50
ultra / 1080p	3−4	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 208% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	2−3	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	12−14
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	5−6	45−50
medium / 1080p	3−4	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 833% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	60−65	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 43% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	75−80
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	6−7	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 383% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	12−14	85−90
medium / 768p	10−11	50−55
high / 1080p	5−6	27−30
ultra / 1080p	4−5	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 457% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	40−45
high / 768p	30−33	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FirePro V4900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V4900	Quadro M2200
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell
Code name	Turks	N17P-Q3
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 November 2011	13 January 2017
Pipelines	480	1024
Core clock speed	800 MHz	694 MHz
Boost Clock		1038 MHz
Transistor count	716 million	1870 Million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops
Length	163 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5508 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	88 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	5.0
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	N/A
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	73 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
3D Stereo		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V4900 vs Quadro M2200

Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares