FirePro W7100 vs Quadro M2200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W7100 and Quadro M2200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W7100 stacks up against Quadro M2200, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W7100
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7100 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 627% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- FirePro W7100 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M2200.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 226 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- FirePro W7100 and Quadro M2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 508 MHz higher, than FirePro W7100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W7100 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro W7100 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 48% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 45% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 58% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 58% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7100 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tonga | N17P-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 12 August 2014 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 694 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 103.0 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5508 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |