GeForce 840A vs Quadro M2200
In this comparison between GeForce 840A and Quadro M2200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 840A will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 840A
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 840A | Quadro M2200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2200 has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce 840A.
- Quadro M2200 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 840A and Quadro M2200 are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840A is 335 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- GeForce 840A and Quadro M2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 3506 MHz higher, than GeForce 840A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 354% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 357% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 218% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 262% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 360% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 840A | Quadro M2200 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM108 | N17P-Q3 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 694 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1870 Million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 5508 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |