GeForce 9800 GTX vs Quadro M2200
In this comparison between GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro M2200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 9800 GTX will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 9800 GTX
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | Quadro M2200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 154% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro M2200.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 994 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro M2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 4408 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 596% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 513% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 505% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 62% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 862% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | Quadro M2200 | |
| Architecture | Tesla | Maxwell |
| Code name | G92 | N17P-Q3 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 March 2008 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 128 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 694 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 5508 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | Via Adapter | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |