GeForce GT 745A vs Quadro M2200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 745A and Quadro M2200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 745A stacks up against Quadro M2200, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GT 745A
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 745A | Quadro M2200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2200 has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 745A.
- Quadro M2200 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GT 745A is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 745A is 143 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- GeForce GT 745A and Quadro M2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 3708 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 745A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 422% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 745A and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 168% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 118% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 252% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 370% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 184% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 52% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 285% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 387% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 745A | Quadro M2200 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK107 | N17P-Q3 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 August 2013 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 694 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 915 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.28 | |
| Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5508 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 26 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |