GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro M2200
When comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro M2200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro M2200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 280
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro M2200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 329% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 602 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro M2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 4401 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 455% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 800% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 477% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 833% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 480% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 557% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro M2200 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GT200 | N17P-Q3 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 13 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 240 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 694 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1870 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 5508 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |