GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro M2200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro M2200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro M2200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 425% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than Quadro M2200.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 548 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 4509 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 354% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 357% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 218% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 262% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 360% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | N17P-Q3 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 694 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 5508 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |