GeForce GTX 850A vs Quadro M2200
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro M2200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 850A will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 850A
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Quadro M2200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2200 has 22% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- Quadro M2200 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 850A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro M2200 are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 208 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro M2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 3708 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 455% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 620% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 477% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 833% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 480% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 557% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Quadro M2200 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM107 | N17P-Q3 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 694 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 936 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.44 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5508 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |