GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro M2200
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 960A and Quadro M2200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 960A will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 960A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Quadro M2200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960A has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960A.
- GeForce GTX 960A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 960A and Quadro M2200 are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 335 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- GeForce GTX 960A and Quadro M2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 496 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 86% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Quadro M2200 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | GM107 | N17P-Q3 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 13 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 694 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1870 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5508 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Quadro M2200 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Quadro M2200 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 580
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon HD 7870 XT
- Quadro M2200 vs GeForce GTX 580
- Quadro M2200 vs Radeon HD 7870 XT