GRID K280Q vs Quadro M2200
In this comparison between GRID K280Q and Quadro M2200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K280Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K280Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
GRID K280Q | Quadro M2200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- GRID K280Q and Quadro M2200 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 51 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- GRID K280Q and Quadro M2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 508 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 91% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 105% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 36% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 87% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 70% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 95% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 122% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 14% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 95% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K280Q | Quadro M2200 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK104 | N17P-Q3 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 13 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 694 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1870 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5508 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |