GRID K520 vs Quadro M2200

In this comparison between GRID K520 and Quadro M2200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K520 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K520

Quadro M2200 Check Price

Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:

Quadro M2200 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K520	Quadro M2200
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	55 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K520 has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
GRID K520 and Quadro M2200 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 51 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
GRID K520 and Quadro M2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 508 MHz higher, than GRID K520.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	9−10	14−16
QHD / 1440p	4−5	8−9
4K / 2160p	4−5	6−7
low / 720p	30−35	40−45
medium / 1080p	20−22	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	24−27	35−40
ultra / 1080p	21−24	30−35
QHD / 1440p	9−10	16−18
4K / 2160p	6−7	10−11
low / 720p	55−60	75−80
medium / 1080p	27−30	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 44% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	210−220	240−250
medium / 768p	180−190	210−220
ultra / 1080p	100−110	130−140
QHD / 1440p	55−60	100−110
4K / 2160p	30−35	55−60
high / 768p	140−150	180−190
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	55−60
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	95−100	110−120
ultra / 1080p	65−70	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 17% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	18−20	27−30
ultra / 1080p	18−20	24−27
QHD / 1440p	16−18	21−24
4K / 2160p	6−7	9−10
low / 720p	40−45	55−60
medium / 1080p	21−24	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	27−30	35−40
ultra / 1080p	21−24	27−30
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	100−110	130−140
medium / 1080p	55−60	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 30% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	27−30	35−40
ultra / 1080p	21−24	30−33
QHD / 1440p	10−11	16−18
4K / 2160p	10−11	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	75−80
medium / 1080p	30−35	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
medium / 768p	80−85	100−110
high / 1080p	30−35	45−50
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
QHD / 1440p	4−5	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	10−11	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	12−14
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	3−4	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	45−50
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	60−65	75−80
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GRID K520.
high / 1080p	14−16	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−11	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	30−35	45−50
medium / 1080p	16−18	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	60−65	85−90
medium / 768p	35−40	50−55
high / 1080p	20−22	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
4K / 2160p	8−9	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 39% more, than GRID K520.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	40−45
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro M2200.

Full Specs

	GRID K520	Quadro M2200
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK104	N17P-Q3
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 July 2013	13 January 2017
Pipelines	1536	1024
Core clock speed	745 MHz	694 MHz
Boost Clock		1038 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1870 Million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36
Floating-point performance	2x 2,448 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5508 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	88 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	76 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
3D Stereo		+
		Check Price

GRID K520 vs Quadro M2200

Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares