HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro M2200
When choosing between HD Graphics 630 and Quadro M2200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between HD Graphics 630 and Quadro M2200.
HD Graphics 630
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2200 has 266% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 has 60 GB more memory, than Quadro M2200.
- HD Graphics 630 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- HD Graphics 630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 394 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 370% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 215% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 370% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 215% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 43% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 387% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Maxwell |
| Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | N17P-Q3 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2017 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 694 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5508 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |