P106 090 vs Quadro M2200
In this comparison between P106 090 and Quadro M2200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P106 090 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 090
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| P106 090 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- P106 090 has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 has 1 GB more memory, than P106 090.
- P106 090 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- P106 090 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 660 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- P106 090 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Quadro M2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 2500 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 42% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 51% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 9% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 62% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
Full Specs
| P106 090 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Code name | GP106 | N17P-Q3 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 31 July 2017 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 694 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.49 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 5508 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |