Quadro FX 4800 vs Quadro M2200
When comparing Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro M2200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro M2200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 4800
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Quadro M2200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1532 GB more memory, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 92 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 3908 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 525% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 161% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 127% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 275% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 428% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 833% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 683% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 680% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Quadro M2200 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GT200B | N17P-Q3 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 13 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 694 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1870 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5508 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |