Quadro M2200 vs Radeon HD 4830
When comparing Quadro M2200 and Radeon HD 4830, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M2200 and Radeon HD 4830 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 4830
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4830 has 72% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Radeon HD 4830 has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4830 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 4830 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 119 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
- Quadro M2200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4830 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 3708 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 733% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M2200 and Radeon HD 4830 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 178% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 147% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 875% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 333% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 642% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 300% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 1450% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 866% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1020% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 70% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Code name | N17P-Q3 | RV770 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 21 October 2008 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 694 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1870 Million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 736.0 gflops | |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5508 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |