Quadro M2200 vs Radeon HD 7870 XT
In this comparison between Quadro M2200 and Radeon HD 7870 XT you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M2200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7870 XT will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 7870 XT
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2200 | Radeon HD 7870 XT | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 185 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 7870 XT has 236% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7870 XT.
- Quadro M2200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 7870 XT - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 7870 XT - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7870 XT is 231 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 and Radeon HD 7870 XT are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7870 XT is 492 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870 XT in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870 XT in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro M2200 and Radeon HD 7870 XT have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 240−250 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 180−190 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870 XT in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Quadro M2200 and Radeon HD 7870 XT have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870 XT in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870 XT in Far Cry 5 is 48% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870 XT in Fortnite is 45% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870 XT in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870 XT in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870 XT in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870 XT in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870 XT in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870 XT in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 58% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870 XT in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 58% more, than Quadro M2200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870 XT in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro M2200. |
Full Specs
Quadro M2200 | Radeon HD 7870 XT | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N17P-Q3 | Tahiti |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 13 January 2017 | 19 November 2012 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 694 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 975 MHz |
Transistor count | 1870 Million | 4,313 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 93.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5508 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 346 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 14.5 Mh/s | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |