Quadro M2200 vs Radeon R7 M350
In this comparison between Quadro M2200 and Radeon R7 M350 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M2200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M350 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M350
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2200 has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Quadro M2200 and Radeon R7 M350 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro M2200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 31 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 4508 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 455% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 650% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 275% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 420% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 833% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 480% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 557% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N17P-Q3 | Opal |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 694 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1870 Million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 19.80 | |
| Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5508 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |