Quadro M2200 vs Radeon R7 M465X
When choosing between Quadro M2200 and Radeon R7 M465X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M2200 and Radeon R7 M465X.
Radeon R7 M465X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2200 | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro M2200 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- Quadro M2200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 206 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 and Radeon R7 M465X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 1008 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 170% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 193% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 240−250 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 40% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 172% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 173% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 115% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 145% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 178% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. |
Full Specs
Quadro M2200 | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N17P-Q3 | Tropo |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 13 January 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 694 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 1870 Million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5508 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |