Quadro M2200 vs Radeon R9 M375X
When comparing Quadro M2200 and Radeon R9 M375X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M2200 and Radeon R9 M375X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M375X
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2200 and Radeon R9 M375X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro M2200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M375X is 231 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 and Radeon R9 M375X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 4383 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 125% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 147% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 105% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 127% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 86% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 84% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 129% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N17P-Q3 | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 694 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1015 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1870 Million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 40.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5508 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |