Quadro M2200 vs Radeon RX Vega 11
In this comparison between Quadro M2200 and Radeon RX Vega 11 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M2200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 11 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX Vega 11
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | IGP | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2200 has 266% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega 11.
- Quadro M2200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - with Vega.
- Quadro M2200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 130% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 113% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 47% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 115% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 122% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 42% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 84% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 116% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Vega |
| Code name | N17P-Q3 | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 26 October 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 704 |
| Core clock speed | 694 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1240 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1870 Million | 4,940 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 61.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5508 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |