Quadro M2200 vs UHD Graphics 630
When comparing Quadro M2200 and UHD Graphics 630, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M2200 and UHD Graphics 630 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
UHD Graphics 630
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2200 | UHD Graphics 630 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2200 has 266% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 630.
- Quadro M2200 is used in Mobile workstations, and UHD Graphics 630 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and UHD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 394 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 630.
- Quadro M2200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 370% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 215% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 370% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 215% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 43% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 387% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2200 | UHD Graphics 630 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 9.5 |
| Code name | N17P-Q3 | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 1 October 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 694 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1870 Million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.45 | |
| Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5508 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |