FirePro M4150 vs Quadro M3000M
When comparing FirePro M4150 and Quadro M3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and Quadro M3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Quadro M3000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro M3000M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 335 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4150 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 139% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 443% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 44% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 71% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Quadro M3000M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Opal | GM204 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1,024 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 67.20 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 2,150 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 253 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |