FirePro M5950 vs Quadro M3000M
When comparing FirePro M5950 and Quadro M3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M5950 and Quadro M3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M5950 and Quadro M3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M5950 and Quadro M3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 or Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950
Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M3000M has 114% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M3000M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 325 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 4100 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
35−40
ultra / 1080p
2−3
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
6−7
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 485% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
9−10
55−60
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
20−22
100−110
medium / 1080p
9−10
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
95−100
220−230
ultra / 1080p
45−50
180−190
QHD / 1440p
27−30
110−120
4K / 2160p
18−20
70−75
high / 768p
70−75
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
FirePro M5950 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
50−55
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−33
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
5−6
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
2−3
14−16
low / 720p
14−16
80−85
medium / 1080p
6−7
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
7−8
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
55−60
180−190
medium / 1080p
18−20
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 335% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
9−10
60−65
ultra / 1080p
8−9
45−50
QHD / 1440p
3−4
30−35
4K / 2160p
3−4
24−27
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
10−12
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
40−45
120−130
high / 1080p
8−9
70−75
ultra / 1080p
4−5
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 272% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
3−4
24−27
ultra / 1080p
1−2
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
9−10
65−70
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
ultra / 1080p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
9−10
65−70
medium / 1080p
8−9
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 400% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
20−22
130−140
medium / 768p
12−14
85−90
high / 1080p
7−8
45−50
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
4K / 2160p
2−3
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 55% more, than FirePro M5950.
Full Specs
FirePro M5950
Quadro M3000M
Architecture
Terascale 2
Maxwell
Code name
Whistler-XT
GM204
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
13 April 2011
2 October 2015
Pipelines
480
1,024
Core clock speed
725 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
17.40
67.20
Floating-point performance
696.0 gflops
2,150 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.0
5.0
OpenGL
4.4
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
5.2
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
67 Mh/s
253 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Form factor
MXM-A
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price