FirePro M7740 vs Quadro M3000M
In this comparison between FirePro M7740 and Quadro M3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M7740 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M7740 and Quadro M3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M7740 and Quadro M3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 or Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M7740
Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M3000M has 25% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M3000M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 400 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 4000 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
12−14
55−60
ultra / 1080p
10−11
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
130−140
250−260
medium / 768p
110−120
220−230
ultra / 1080p
50−55
180−190
QHD / 1440p
27−30
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
80−85
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−35
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 101% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
8−9
45−50
ultra / 1080p
7−8
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
3−4
14−16
low / 720p
18−20
80−85
medium / 1080p
8−9
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−11
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
60−65
180−190
medium / 1080p
21−24
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 277% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
1−2
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
50−55
140−150
medium / 768p
45−50
120−130
high / 1080p
12−14
70−75
ultra / 1080p
6−7
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
4−5
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
12−14
65−70
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 36% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than FirePro M7740.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
12−14
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
24−27
130−140
medium / 768p
16−18
85−90
high / 1080p
9−10
45−50
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
50−55
high / 768p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 42% more, than FirePro M7740.
Full Specs
FirePro M7740
Quadro M3000M
Architecture
Terascale 1
Maxwell
Code name
RV740
GM204
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
4 August 2009
2 October 2015
Pipelines
640
1,024
Core clock speed
650 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
826 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
20.80
67.20
Floating-point performance
832.0 gflops
2,150 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
54.14 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
12
Shader Model
4.1
5.0
OpenGL
3.3
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
253 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price