FirePro S9000 vs Quadro M3000M
When comparing FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S9000
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Quadro M3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 366% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M3000M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 150 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 500 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Quadro M3000M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tahiti | GM204 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1,024 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 67.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 2,150 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 253 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |