FirePro W8000 vs Quadro M3000M
In this comparison between FirePro W8000 and Quadro M3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8000
Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W8000 has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro W8000 and Quadro M3000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
FirePro W8000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W8000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 150 MHz higher, than FirePro W8000.
FirePro W8000 and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W8000 is 500 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro W8000.
high / 1080p
27−30
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
QHD / 1440p
7−8
35−40
4K / 2160p
6−7
18−20
low / 720p
60−65
100−110
medium / 1080p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than FirePro W8000.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
50−55
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W8000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
220−230
250−260
medium / 768p
190−200
220−230
ultra / 1080p
100−110
180−190
QHD / 1440p
65−70
110−120
4K / 2160p
35−40
70−75
high / 768p
150−160
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than FirePro W8000.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
FirePro W8000 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
70−75
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than FirePro W8000.
high / 1080p
21−24
45−50
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
QHD / 1440p
18−20
27−30
4K / 2160p
6−7
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
80−85
medium / 1080p
21−24
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than FirePro W8000.
high / 1080p
27−30
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
QHD / 1440p
14−16
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
110−120
180−190
medium / 1080p
60−65
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 81% more, than FirePro W8000.
high / 1080p
30−33
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
QHD / 1440p
10−12
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
60−65
100−110
medium / 1080p
30−35
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than FirePro W8000.
low / 768p
95−100
140−150
medium / 768p
85−90
120−130
high / 1080p
35−40
70−75
ultra / 1080p
14−16
30−35
QHD / 1440p
4−5
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than FirePro W8000.
high / 1080p
10−12
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
low / 720p
35−40
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than FirePro W8000.
low / 768p
110−120
130−140
medium / 1080p
110−120
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 13% more, than FirePro W8000.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than FirePro W8000.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than FirePro W8000.
low / 768p
65−70
130−140
medium / 768p
40−45
85−90
high / 1080p
21−24
45−50
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
4K / 2160p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than FirePro W8000.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
50−55
high / 768p
55−60
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 8% more, than FirePro W8000.
Full Specs
FirePro W8000
Quadro M3000M
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Code name
Tahiti
GM204
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
14 June 2012
2 October 2015
Pipelines
1792
1,024
Core clock speed
900 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
67.20
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
2,150 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
176 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
5.2
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
391 Mh/s
253 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price