GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs Quadro M3000M
In this comparison between GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Quadro M3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 9800M GT SLI will be the best choice, for others Quadro M3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Quadro M3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Quadro M3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GT SLI or Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800M GT SLI
Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
130 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 73% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro M3000M.
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 550 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro M3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 4200 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
5−6
35−40
ultra / 1080p
3−4
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
7−8
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 485% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
10−11
55−60
ultra / 1080p
9−10
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
10−11
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
100−105
220−230
ultra / 1080p
45−50
180−190
QHD / 1440p
24−27
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
70−75
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 168% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
50−55
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−33
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 116% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
7−8
45−50
ultra / 1080p
6−7
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
3−4
14−16
low / 720p
16−18
80−85
medium / 1080p
7−8
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
9−10
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
55−60
180−190
medium / 1080p
18−20
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 308% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
10−12
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−11
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
12−14
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
40−45
120−130
high / 1080p
10−11
70−75
ultra / 1080p
6−7
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 257% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
4−5
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
10−11
65−70
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
130−140
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
10−11
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
21−24
130−140
medium / 768p
14−16
85−90
high / 1080p
8−9
45−50
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 461% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce 9800M GT SLI
Quadro M3000M
Architecture
G9x
Maxwell
Code name
NB9E-GT2
GM204
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
15 July 2008
2 October 2015
Pipelines
192
1,024
Core clock speed
500 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
1508 Million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
67.20
Floating-point performance
2,150 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12
Shader Model
5.0
OpenGL
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.2
SLI options
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
253 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price