GeForce GT 640 vs Quadro M3000M
In this comparison between GeForce GT 640 and Quadro M3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 640 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 640
Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M3000M has 15% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M3000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 640.
GeForce GT 640 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GT 640 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 148 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 640.
GeForce GT 640 and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 3218 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 640.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
35−40
ultra / 1080p
1−2
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p
7−8
55−60
ultra / 1080p
5−6
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
20−22
100−110
medium / 1080p
7−8
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GT 640 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
250−260
medium / 768p
90−95
220−230
ultra / 1080p
45−50
180−190
QHD / 1440p
24−27
110−120
4K / 2160p
18−20
70−75
high / 768p
65−70
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
GeForce GT 640 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
70−75
120−130
medium / 768p
50−55
110−120
ultra / 1080p
27−30
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p
3−4
45−50
ultra / 1080p
3−4
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
2−3
14−16
low / 720p
14−16
80−85
medium / 1080p
4−5
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p
10−12
60−65
ultra / 1080p
5−6
45−50
QHD / 1440p
2−3
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
50−55
180−190
medium / 1080p
16−18
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 411% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p
6−7
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
4−5
30−35
4K / 2160p
2−3
24−27
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
9−10
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 544% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p
45−50
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
7−8
70−75
ultra / 1080p
3−4
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p
2−3
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
4−5
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p
80−85
130−140
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce GT 640.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
7−8
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p
14−16
130−140
medium / 768p
10−11
85−90
high / 1080p
5−6
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
4K / 2160p
0−1
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 812% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GT 640.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 640
Quadro M3000M
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
GK107
GM204
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
5 June 2012
2 October 2015
Pipelines
384
1,024
Core clock speed
902 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
28.86
67.20
Floating-point performance
692.7 gflops
2,150 gflops
Length
145 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
253 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price