GeForce GT 745A vs Quadro M3000M
When comparing GeForce GT 745A and Quadro M3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 745A and Quadro M3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GT 745A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Quadro M3000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M3000M has 127% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 745A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro M3000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GT 745A is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 213 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 745A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 655% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 745A and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 201% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 130% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 411% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 272% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 471% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce GT 745A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Quadro M3000M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK107 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 26 August 2013 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1,024 |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.28 | 67.20 |
Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | 2,150 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 26 Mh/s | 253 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |