GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Quadro M3000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Quadro M3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 765M SLI will be the best choice, for others Quadro M3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Quadro M3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Quadro M3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M SLI or Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
130 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2x 2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 765M SLI has 73% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
Quadro M3000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 1000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
18−20
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
5−6
16−18
4K / 2160p
4−5
10−11
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
high / 1080p
30−33
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
QHD / 1440p
10−11
35−40
4K / 2160p
7−8
18−20
low / 720p
60−65
100−110
medium / 1080p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
220−230
250−260
medium / 768p
190−200
220−230
ultra / 1080p
110−120
180−190
QHD / 1440p
80−85
110−120
4K / 2160p
40−45
70−75
high / 768p
160−170
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
75−80
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
45−50
ultra / 1080p
21−24
40−45
QHD / 1440p
18−20
27−30
4K / 2160p
7−8
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
80−85
medium / 1080p
24−27
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 79% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
high / 1080p
30−35
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
QHD / 1440p
14−16
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
110−120
180−190
medium / 1080p
65−70
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 74% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
high / 1080p
30−35
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
QHD / 1440p
12−14
30−35
4K / 2160p
12−14
24−27
low / 720p
65−70
100−110
medium / 1080p
35−40
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
low / 768p
100−105
140−150
medium / 768p
90−95
120−130
high / 1080p
35−40
70−75
ultra / 1080p
14−16
30−35
QHD / 1440p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
low / 720p
35−40
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
low / 768p
110−120
130−140
medium / 1080p
110−120
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−11
16−18
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
low / 720p
35−40
65−70
medium / 1080p
20−22
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
low / 768p
70−75
130−140
medium / 768p
40−45
85−90
high / 1080p
24−27
45−50
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
4K / 2160p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 93% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
high / 768p
55−60
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
Quadro M3000M
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
GM204
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
30 May 2013
2 October 2015
Pipelines
1536
1,024
Core clock speed
850 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
2x 2540 Million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
67.20
Floating-point performance
2,150 gflops
Memory bus width
2x 128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
12
Shader Model
5.0
OpenGL
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.2
SLI options
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
253 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
