GRID K520 vs Quadro M3000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K520 and Quadro M3000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K520 and Quadro M3000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K520
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Quadro M3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K520 and Quadro M3000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 305 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 and Quadro M3000M is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 89% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID K520. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Quadro M3000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK104 | GM204 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1,024 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 67.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 2,150 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | 253 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |