HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro M3000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing HD Graphics 630 and Quadro M3000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between HD Graphics 630 and Quadro M3000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
HD Graphics 630
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Quadro M3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M3000M has 400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 630 has 60 GB more memory, than Quadro M3000M.
- HD Graphics 630 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- HD Graphics 630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 750 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 112% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 357% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 71% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Quadro M3000M | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Maxwell |
| Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | GM204 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2017 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1,024 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 67.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 2,150 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 253 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |