Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro M3000M

    If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro M3000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 645 stacks up against Quadro M3000M, check out specs charts below.
    Iris Plus Graphics 645 Check Price
    Quadro M3000M Check Price

    Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro M3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro M3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 or Quadro M3000M here:

    Iris Plus Graphics 645 Laptops
    Quadro M3000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 645 Quadro M3000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type DDR3/DDR4 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro M3000M has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 750 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M3000M - by 28 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 4−5 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 2−3 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 12−14 60−65
    medium / 1080p 5−6 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.

    Full Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 645 Quadro M3000M
    Architecture Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake Maxwell
    Code name Kaby Lake GT3e GM204
    Type Laptop Mobile workstation
    Release date 10 July 2019 2 October 2015
    Pipelines 48 1,024
    Core clock speed 300 MHz 1050 MHz
    Boost Clock 1150 MHz
    Transistor count 5,200 million
    Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 50.40 67.20
    Floating-point performance 2,150 gflops
    Memory bus width 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 5000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 160 GB/s
    Shared memory + -
    DirectX 12 (12_1) 12
    Shader Model 6.4 5.0
    OpenGL 4.6 4.5
    OpenCL 2.1 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.103 1.1.126
    CUDA 5.2
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 253 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    Optimus +
    Quick Sync +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares