Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Quadro M3000M
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro M3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro M3000M.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro M3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro M3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 or Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M3000M has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 60 GB more memory, than Quadro M3000M.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 700 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
20−22
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−12
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 272% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
14−16
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
30−35
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
150−160
250−260
medium / 768p
130−140
220−230
ultra / 1080p
65−70
180−190
QHD / 1440p
35−40
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
95−100
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
medium / 768p
70−75
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
10−11
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
80−85
medium / 1080p
10−12
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
70−75
180−190
medium / 1080p
30−35
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 209% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
3−4
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
30−35
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
60−65
140−150
medium / 768p
50−55
120−130
high / 1080p
16−18
70−75
ultra / 1080p
8−9
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 165% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
low / 720p
16−18
65−70
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 342% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
16−18
65−70
medium / 1080p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
30−35
130−140
medium / 768p
21−24
85−90
high / 1080p
10−12
45−50
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 287% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
50−55
high / 768p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro M3000M
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Maxwell
Code name
Skylake GT4e
GM204
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 September 2015
2 October 2015
Pipelines
72
1,024
Core clock speed
350 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
72.00
67.20
Floating-point performance
2,150 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Shader Model
6.4
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.97
1.1.126
CUDA
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
253 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
